🚀 SOLANA (SVM) vs EVM: ANOTHER WAY TO INTERACT WITH THE BLOCKCHAIN 🚀
🌟 Lately, I’ve been working with the Solana blockchain, and I’ve discovered several very interesting advantages.
1️⃣ IMPROVED USER EXPERIENCE (UX)
In EVM, each operation is executed as a separate transaction, requiring multiple confirmations, clicks, and waiting times.
In contrast, Solana allows grouping multiple instructions within a single transaction, making processes faster, smoother, and less tedious for users.
2️⃣ ADDRESS TABLE ACCOUNT (ATA)
Solana uses a special Address Table Account (ATA) that is automatically created the first time you interact with a token.
- 🚫 Avoiding Spam – To send you a token you’ve never interacted with, someone must bear the cost of creating the corresponding ATA, discouraging mass spam token distribution.
- 📂 Better Organization – By separating token accounts, balance management becomes clearer and more efficient.
💡 Key Difference With EVM?
- In EVM, there’s no equivalent mechanism, meaning any token can be sent directly to your wallet, increasing the risk of spam and unwanted tokens.
3️⃣ DEV TOOLS
Developing on Solana is very intuitive thanks to:
- Solana/Web3.js libraries
- coral-xyz/Anchor framework
- Better transaction management – You can calculate transaction costs and adjust gas before executing them.
🔥 The Verdict
Every blockchain has its strengths, but Solana stands out in speed and transaction processing.
📣 What Do You Think?
Have you worked with Solana or EVM? Which one do you prefer? Let me know your thoughts! 👇🚀